The author of the communication is J.I., a national of Afghanistan. He claims that his deportation to Afghanistan by the Sweden would violate his rights under articles 6, 7 and 18 of the Covenant.

The author claims that worshippers of traditional (mainstream) religions in Kazakhstan, such as Islam and Christianity, are not required to obtain permission to hold their ceremonies outside of their places of registration.

In 2011, the author was stopped for an identity check while wearing her niqab.

The constitutional validity of provisions in the Orissa Freedom of Religion Act 1967

A French citizen filed an application against France to challenge the ban on the full face veil (Law no. 2010-1192 of 11 October 2010 entered into force in France on 11 April 2011, prohibiting any person from concealing their face in public).

Appellant along with other Muslim ladies was plucking Falsa, uttering derogatory remarks against a Holy Prophet

Re Suo moto actions regarding suicide bomb attack of 22.9.2013 on the Church in Peshawar and regarding threats being given to Kalash tribe and Ismailies in Chitra being coerced toconvert to a different sect within Islam or to face death.

The issue was whether Ordinance No. XX of 1984, The Anti-Islamic Activities of the Qadiani Group, Lahore Group and Ahmadis (Prohibition and Punishment) Ordinance, 1984 violates the Pakistani Constitution.

E complained that the exclusion of his son, M, from admission to the appellant school had been racially discriminatory.

The appellant practised scientology. She planned to get married in a Church of Scientology.